The effect of VOC and environmental parameters on ozone sensors performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate measurement of ozone concentration, especially in workplaces is a crucial component of managing indoor air quality and protecting workers’ and building occupants’ health and safety. Some factors such as gaseous pollutants (like volatile organic compounds (VOCs)), relative humidity, and air velocity and direction could interfere with monitor readings. This study examined the impact of these environmental factors on the responses of six commercial ozone monitors: three UV photometry, two electrochemical and one semiconductor metal oxide. The results demonstrated that environmental physical parameters (i.e. air velocity and relative humidity) often slightly affected UV instrument’s performance, while significant effects were seen in electrochemical and semiconductor monitors. Furthermore, chemical parameters (only VOCs including ethanol, acetone and toluene) had more influence on UV ozone monitors than those using electrochemical and metal oxide techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it