A 360° Omnidirectional Photometer using a Ricoh Theta Z1
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spot photometers measure the luminance that is emitted or reflected from a small surface area in a physical environment. Because the measurement is limited to a “spot,” capturing dense luminance readings for an entire environment is impractical. In this paper, we provide preliminary results demonstrating the potential of using an off-the-shelf commercial camera to operate as a 360° luminance meter. Our method uses the Ricoh Theta Z1 camera, which provides a full 360° omnidirectional field of view and an API to access the camera’s minimally processed RAW images. Working from the RAW images, we describe a calibration method to map the RAW images under different exposures and ISO settings to luminance values. By combining the calibrated sensor with multi-exposure high-dynamic-range imaging, we provide a cost-effective mechanism to capture dense luminance maps of environments. Our results show that our luminance meter performs well when validated against a significantly more expensive spot photometer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it