MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION USING MULTI-LAYER PERCEPTRON MIXER (MLP-MIXER)

2023· article· en· W4319601347 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsCentre For Cold Ocean Resources EngineeringMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligencePerceptronMultilayer perceptronComputer scienceCurse of dimensionalityContextual image classificationImage (mathematics)Artificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The classifying of hyperspectral images (HSI) is a difficult task given the high dimensionality of the space, the huge number of spectral bands, and the small number of labeled data. As such, we offer a unique hyperspectral image classification methodology to address these issues based on sophisticated Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) algorithms. In this paper, we propose using MLP-Mixer to classify HSI data in three data benchmarks of Pavia, Salinas, and Indian Pines. Based on the results, the proposed MLP-Mixer achieved a high level of classification accuracy and produced noise-free and homogenous classification maps in all study areas. For the classification of HSI data in Salinas, Indian Pines, and Pavia, the proposed MLP-Mixer achieved an average accuracy of 99.82%, 99.81%, and 99.23%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it