MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319840215 · doi:10.1177/00375497221141463

DP in ice environments—development of a dynamic positioning in ice validation platform (DPIVP)

2023· article· en· W4319840215 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIMULATION · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImplementationComputer scienceModular designUnit testingSoftwareComponent (thermodynamics)Integration testingModularity (biology)Systems engineeringSimulationSoftware engineeringEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development of a dynamic positioning in ice validation platform (DPIVP) which is part of a larger research project aimed at developing dynamic positioning (DP) system technologies for ice-rich environments. One outcome is simulation software to aid research in this area. The DPIVP software was designed to realistically simulate the dynamics of ice-structure interactions for real-time applications and to validate components common to DP in ice simulations. The software consists of many components which the DPIVP ties together as a unified system. All components have well-defined interfaces. Many of them are also distributed, allowing execution on separate computers and/or CPUs which helps ensure real-time operation. These two characteristics also decreases coupling and encourages a more modular design with the benefit of easily substituting alternative component implementations without reprogramming the DPIVP. Alternate implementations are useful for conducting research in specific DP in ice areas without substantially changing the system, such as alternative ice force models, DP control algorithms, vessel models, 3D and 2D visualization, environment models, and data acquisition systems. The integrated system was tested and evaluated using unit testing, integration testing, and system testing. The completed system was also validated using test cases that match physical model tests; the results compared favorably. Although the software has some limitations, for example, validated ice-force models being limited to two vessels, and thus lacks the generality we wish, the end result is a working prototype that satisfies the research requirements and provides an architecture and framework for future development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it