MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319863551 · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3238695

Identification of Cellular Signal Measurements Using Machine Learning

2023· article· en· W4319863551 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsAllen-Vanguard (Canada)Memorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCellular networkComputer scienceIdentification (biology)GSMInterference (communication)Mobile telephonySIGNAL (programming language)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMobile radioEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectrum awareness has a plethora of civilian and defense applications, such as spectrum resource management, adaptive transmissions, interference detection, and identification of threat signals. This article proposes an identification neural network (INN)-based model that identifies cellular signals from three different radio access technologies, namely global system for mobile (GSM) communications, universal mobile telecommunications service, and long-term evolution. The proposed INN identifies whether or not the measured power spectral density belongs to a certain cellular signal type. Two data collection approaches (DCAs) are considered: in-band and multiple-band. The over-the-air measurements for the two DCAs show that with low computational complexity, the proposed INN model provides an identification accuracy between 93% and 100%, with a false alarm (FA) rate between 0% and 10%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it