MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320012155 · doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2023.01.015

Use of risankizumab in two HIV-positive patients with psoriasis

2023· article· en· W4320012155 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAD Case Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsoriasisDermatologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PopulationClinical trialImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–associated psoriasis is characterized by greater disease severity, frequent exacerbations, atypical presentations, and treatment resistance.1Morar N. Willis-Owen S.A. Maurer T. Bunker C.B. HIV-associated psoriasis: pathogenesis, clinical features, and management.Lancet Infect Dis. 2010; 10: 470-478https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70101-8Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar In HIV-associated psoriasis that is not responding to therapeutic options including topical medications, phototherapy, or systemic retinoids, the use of biologic therapy can be considered.1Morar N. Willis-Owen S.A. Maurer T. Bunker C.B. HIV-associated psoriasis: pathogenesis, clinical features, and management.Lancet Infect Dis. 2010; 10: 470-478https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70101-8Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar The potential additional risk of a serious infection through the use of biologics in immunocompromised patients with HIV is why these patients have been excluded from controlled trials regardless of their level of HIV control.2Bartos G. Cline A. Beroukhim K. Burrall B.A. Feldman S.R. Current biological therapies for use in HIV-positive patients with psoriasis: case report of gesulkumab used and review.Dermatol Online J. 2018; 24 (13030/qt3db748cg)Crossref PubMed Google Scholar The purpose of this case series is to shed light on the efficacy and tolerability of biologics in this population, by providing the details of 2 HIV-positive patients with psoriasis successfully managed with risankizumab. Patient 1 is a 36-year-old man with a long-standing history of severe guttate psoriasis. His medical history included depression and COVID-19. He was stable on highly active antiretroviral therapy, as his HIV viral load was undetectable and his CD4 count was 1461 cells/μL. He had tried numerous topical therapies, phototherapy, methotrexate, acitretin, apremilast, and adalimumab. Appropriate trials of these agents did not achieve adequate control of his psoriasis. He was started on risankizumab therapy, standard dosing with a Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) of 5.4. After 5 months of therapy, his psoriasis completely cleared, PASI of 0, no adverse events, a CD4 count of 1225 cells/μL, and undetectable viral load. Patient 2 is a 58-year-old man with a long-standing history of plaque psoriasis. His medical history includes osteoarthritis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, and prior human papillomavirus infection. He was stable on highly active antiretroviral therapy, as his HIV viral load was not detectable and his CD4 count was 831 cells/μL. He had tried several topical therapies, narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen and ultraviolet A, apremilast, and biologic therapies including both ustekinumab and guselkumab. Despite some improvement on biologics, his psoriasis persisted, with a PASI of 4.0, necessitating a switch to risankizumab therapy. After 3 doses, his plaques nearly completely resolved, with no adverse events, a CD4 count of 926 cells/μL, and undetectable viral load. His PASI improved to 1.6. HIV-positive patients may have moderate -to-severe, refractory psoriasis that requires systemic therapy. One recent review of 52 HIV-positive patients with psoriasis treated with biologics (including adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab, and guselkumab) demonstrated that these patients had neither frequent infections nor worsening HIV.3Myers B. Thibodeaux Q. Reddy V. et al.Biologic treatment of 4 HIV-positive patients: A case series and literature review.J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2021; 6: 19-26https://doi.org/10.1177/2475530320954279Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar To date, there has only been one case report published of a psoriasis patient with HIV infection, treated with the interleukin 23 (IL-23) inhibitor risankizumab. This patient had complete clearance of their psoriasis and no worsening of their HIV immunological parameters.4Rob F. Rozsypal H. Successful treatment of psoriasis with risankizumab in an HIV positive patient with sexually transmitted infection comorbidities.Dermatol Ther. 2022; 35e15277https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.15277Crossref Scopus (2) Google Scholar Risankizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of IL-23 approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Our report of 2 patients being successfully treated with risankizumab, adds to the literature that selective inhibition of IL-23 appears to be a suitable therapeutic option for this patient population. Although the data are limited, IL-23 inhibitors appear to be a potential effective treatment option that can be used safely for patients with psoriasis with concomitant HIV infection. Patients should be carefully co-managed by a dermatologist and an HIV specialist. Drs Doiron, Lansang, and Maliyar has no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it