Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This year, the IEEE Future of Electronic Power Processing and Conversion (FEPPCON) XI held in Reykjavik, Iceland, 3–7 June 2022, added a new form of technical session called “Brainstorming for Game-Changing Ideas” through poster presentations and discussions, initiated by the late past president of IEEE Power Electronics Society (PELS) Braham Ferreira. The workshop participants were encouraged to think out-of-the box, identifying game-changing ideas or technology gaps to achieve lofty goals relevant to power electronics. A call for posters was issued to all workshop participants and 11 posters were received, describing big ideas leading to technological breakthroughs or gaps before achieving these advances. The posters were posted to the workshop participants and judged by a small committee as well as voted by all attendees. Four winning posters were selected and their authors presented their summaries to the participants, followed by discussions. The four winning posters are:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it