MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320305327 · doi:10.1353/cdr.2022.0029

Making a Play for God: The Sacre Rappresentzioni of Renaissance Florence by Nerida Newbigin

2022· article· en· W4320305327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pamela M. King

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative drama · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipTerminologyEphemeral keyThe RenaissanceArtClassicsHistoryArt historyLawPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Making a Play for God: The Sacre Rappresentzioni of Renaissance Florence by Nerida Newbigin Pamela M. King (bio) Nerida Newbigin. Making a Play for God: The Sacre Rappresentzioni of Renaissance Florence. 2 Vols. Toronto: Victoria University Centre for Renaissance and Reformation Studies, 2021. Pp. 1039 + 194 illus. $60. Making a Play for God is Nerida Newbigin's life work, gathering together and updating forty years of specialist research and publication on the medieval and early modern religious theatre of Florence. Unsurprisingly, the study is an exhaustive feat of scholarship, but it is also one in which accessibility to an anglophone audience has been scrupulously achieved. The study covers rappresentazione sacre, the generic term for religious plays, including the corpus of sacra rappresentazione, which are specifically Florentine religious plays in octaves introduced and closed by an angel, and also includes those productions described by the term festa, which may refer to a play but equally to a feast day with celebratory and mimetic elements. The owning confraternities do not use the terminology consistently, so the policy in the study is to be inclusive. That inclusivity also covers the nature of surviving evidence, which encompasses texts in manuscript and print as well as those mentioned in name only in financial and other ephemeral accounts. The Introduction opens: The sacre representazioni of Renaissance Florence were not a single and unchanging phenomenon. Both ephemeral, since they existed only in the moment of their performance, and increasingly permanent, as they were copied for posterity, and printed first for an elite market and then to feed an insatiable appetite for devotional entertainment, they existed in a variety of ways and in various environments. The total corpus consists of over 130 texts, whose status either as performance scripts or literary records after the event is unknown, as in the majority of cases is their authorship. The organization of the study, laid out synoptically in the Introduction, is therefore an invaluable act of hand-holding by a commensurate expert guide. The study proper commences with a chapter on the manuscript evidence of the sacre rappresentazioni. The reader is offered a corrective to the received understanding of this signature genre of Florentine early drama formerly based on printed anthologies. The manuscripts give a very different sense of the scope and scale of a rich corpus which reached its peak in the third quarter of the fifteenth century. Manuscript miscellanies were created for various purposes, allowing the plays to survive, but showing few signs of direct contact with performance. It is [End Page 428] also clear that much has been lost, so there is judicious avoidance of speculation about the evolution of form, but an informative discussion of sources. These are identified as being, unsurprisingly, the volgarizzamento, or vernacular interpretations of the Bible and the Legenda Aurea. There is little evidence of authorship apart from Feo Balcari, who systematically oversaw the copying of his works, and an oblique reference to the Pulci family. Here also is one of those passing insights into the rather underplayed distinctiveness of Florentine society in the period, as the relationship with the tradition of ottava rima improvisation is explored. It seems that everyone who was anyone in the Florence of the period was proficient in the tradition. The contents of the various manuscripts discussed cannot be detailed here, but they include plays of the Beheading of John the Baptist, Abraham, a Nativity, an Annunciation including a dispute of virgins, a Raising of Lazarus, one of the miracles of the Virgin, a Judgment of Solomon, a Purification, various cantares, a play of Dives and Pauper, of St Julian, of the martyrdom of St James the Great, and of Ss Peter and Paul. Chapter Two explores 'Plays in Churches'. Again the author warns that scholarship has been slow to correct errors sown in the nineteenth century. The three most famous rappresentazioni were staged by the adult laudesi confraternities, performed in the conventual churches of the Oltrarno from the late fourteenth to mid sixteenth centuries and treated the subjects of the Annunciation, Ascension, and Pentecost. They involved the erection of large mechanical devices built into the church fabric. We are indebted to Giorgio Vasari...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative dramaSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207