Assessing compression algorithms to improve the efficiency of clustering analysis on AIS vessel trajectories
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the maritime environment, the Automatic Identification System (AIS) is used to monitor vessel activity concerning security and safety ocean-wide. AIS data has been used to detect anomalous behaviors related to suspicious activities and hazardous events. Typically, clustering analysis is used to investigate anomalous events within the AIS data stream. However, the main challenge in this approach is to determine and execute the dissimilarity measure between trajectories since they differ in size and time. In addition, these calculations are computationally expensive and not scalable. To tackle this issue, compression algorithms can be applied to perform clustering analysis since they are typically used to reduce storage and processing time. Therefore, the proposed analysis will assess how compression algorithms affect clustering results with respect to detecting anomalous vessel trajectories. The analysis results show that a suitable compression algorithm can reduce the overall processing time with little impact on the clustering results while supporting the scalability of this type of analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it