Transition Waste Optimization for Coded Elastic Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed computing, in which a resource-intensive task is divided into subtasks and distributed among different machines, plays a key role in solving large-scale problems.Coded computingis a recently emerging paradigm where redundancy for distributed computing is introduced to alleviate the impact of slow machines (stragglers) on the completion time. We investigate coded computing solutions over elastic resources, where the set of available machines may change in the middle of the computation. This is motivated by recently available services in the cloud computing industry (e.g., EC2 Spot, Azure Batch) where low-priority virtual machines are offered at a fraction of the price of the on- demand instances but can be preempted on short notice. Our contributions are three-fold. We first introduce a new concept calledtransition wastethat quantifies the number of tasks existing machines must abandon or take over when a machine joins/leaves. We then develop an efficient method to minimize the transition waste for the cyclic task allocation scheme recently proposed in the literature (Yang et al. ISIT’19). Finally, we establish a novel solution based on finite geometry achievingzerotransition wastes given that the number of active machines varies within a fixed range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".