MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321489559 · doi:10.1137/22m1472693

An Adaptive Sampling and Domain Learning Strategy for Multivariate Function Approximation on Unknown Domains

2023· article· en· W4321489559 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences
KeywordsSampling (signal processing)Adaptive samplingCurse of dimensionalityMathematicsMathematical optimizationDomain (mathematical analysis)Sample (material)Function (biology)Function approximationComputer scienceAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMonte Carlo methodFilter (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

.Many problems arising in computational science and engineering can be described in terms of approximating a smooth function of \(d\) variables, defined over an unknown domain of interest \(\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d\) , from sample data. Here both the underlying dimensionality of the problem (in the case \(d\gg 1\) ) as well as the lack of domain knowledge—with \(\Omega\) potentially irregular and/or disconnected—are confounding factors for sampling-based methods. Naïve approaches for such problems often lead to wasted samples and inefficient approximation schemes. For example, uniform sampling can result in upward of 20% wasted samples in some problems considered herein. In applications such as surrogate model construction in computational uncertainty quantification, the high cost of computing samples necessitates a more efficient sampling procedure. Over the last several years methods for computing such approximations from sample data have been studied in the case of irregular domains, and the advantages of computing sampling measures depending on an approximation space \(P\) of \(\dim (P)=N\) have been shown. More specifically, such approaches confer advantages such as stability and well-conditioning, with an asymptotically optimal sample complexity scaling \(\mathcal{O}(N\log (N))\) . The recently proposed adaptive sampling for general domains (ASGD) strategy is one such technique to construct these sampling measures. The main contribution of this paper is a procedure to improve upon the ASGD approach by adaptively updating the sampling measure in the case of unknown domains. We achieve this by first introducing a general domain adaptivity strategy, which computes an approximation of the function and domain of interest from the sample points. Second, we propose an adaptive sampling strategy, termed adaptive sampling for unknown domains (ASUD), which generates sampling measures over a domain that may not be known in advance, based on the ideas introduced in the ASGD approach. We then derive (weighted) least squares and augmented least squares techniques for polynomial approximation on unknown domains. We present numerical experiments demonstrating the efficacy of the adaptive sampling techniques with least squares–based polynomial approximation schemes. Our results show that the ASUD approach consistently achieves errors the same as or smaller than uniform sampling, but using fewer, and often significantly fewer, function evaluations.Keywordshigh-dimensional approximationsampling strategydomain learningirregular domainssurrogate model constructionMSC codes41A1041A1741A6365C05

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it