MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321496229 · doi:10.51731/cjht.2023.575

Wastewater Surveillance for Communicable Diseases

2023· article· en· W4321496229 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michelle A. Clark, Melissa Severn

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Health Technologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWastewaterPopulationEnvironmental healthEpidemiological surveillanceMedicineEpidemiologyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Horizon Scan summarizes the available information regarding wastewater epidemiology, or wastewater surveillance, for the detection of pathogens that cause communicable diseases. Wastewater surveillance can detect the presence of pathogens or chemical substances within the wastewater system and allows for the monitoring of a broad population with a single sample. Wastewater surveillance has been used for decades but has become more common since it was implemented around the world for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes COVID-19. In Canada, wastewater surveillance is currently used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus. Studies conducted in Canada and internationally indicate that wastewater surveillance can be used as a reliable method for detecting pathogens at the population level. Future uses of wastewater surveillance may include monitoring of antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance, detection of cancers in the population, or assessing the prevalence of other infections within communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Health TechnologiesSame topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207