MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322008227 · doi:10.1007/s10514-023-10084-x

Automated group motion control of magnetically actuated millirobots

2023· article· en· W4322008227 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pouria Razzaghi, Ehab Al Khatib, Yildirim Hürmüzlü

Bibliographic record

VenueAutonomous Robots · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSouthern Methodist UniversityCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsComputer scienceRobotFocus (optics)MagnetMotion controlElectromagnetic coilMotion (physics)Position (finance)SimulationArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Small-size robots offer access to spaces that are inaccessible to larger ones. This type of access is crucial in applications such as drug delivery, environmental detection, and collection of small samples. However, there are some tasks that are not possible to perform using only one robot including assembly and manufacturing at small scales, manipulation of micro- and nano- objects, and robot-based structuring of small-scale materials. In this article, we focus on tasks that can be achieved using a group of small-scale robots like pattern formation. These robots are typically externally actuated due to their size limitation. Yet, one faces the challenge of controlling a group of robots using a single global input. In this study, we propose a control algorithm to position individual members of a group in predefined positions. In our previous work, we presented a small-scaled magnetically actuated millirobot. An electromagnetic coil system applied external force and steered the millirobots in various modes of motion such as pivot walking and tumbling. In this paper, we propose two new designs of these millirobots. In the first design, the magnets are placed at the center of body to reduce the magnetic attraction force between the millirobots. In the second design, the millirobots are of identical length with two extra legs acting as the pivot points and varying pivot separation in design to take advantage of variable speed in pivot walking mode while keeping the speed constant in tumbling mode. This paper presents an algorithm for positional control of n millirobots with different lengths to move them from given initial positions to final desired ones. This method is based on choosing a leader that is fully controllable. Then, the motions of other millirobots are regulated by following the leader and determining their appropriate pivot separations in order to implement the intended group motion. Simulations and hardware experiments validate these results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAutonomous RobotsSame topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207