Generalizable Segmentation of COVID-19 Infection From Multi-Site Tomography Scans: A Federated Learning Framework
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COVID-19-like pandemics are a major threat to the global health system that causes a lot of deaths across ages. Large-scale medical images (i.e., X-rays, computed tomography (CT)) dataset is favored to the accuracy of deep learning (DL) in the screening of COVID-19-like pneumonia. The cost, time, and efforts for acquiring and annotating, for instance, large CT datasets make it impossible to obtain large numbers of samples from a single institution. The research attentions have been moved toward sharing medical images from numerous medical institutions. However, owing to the necessity to preserve the privacy of the data of a patient, it is challenging to build a centralized dataset from many institutions, especially during the pandemic. More. The difference in the data acquisition process from one institution to another brings another challenge known as distribution heterogeneity. This paper presents a novel federated learning framework, called Federated Multi-Site COVID-19 (FEDMSCOV), for efficient, generalizable, and privacy-preserved segmentation of COVID-19 infection from multi-site data. In FEDMSCOV, a novel is local drift smoothing (LDS) module encodes the input from feature space to frequency space, aiming to suppress the modules that are not conducive to generalization. Given the smoothed local updated, FEDMSCOV presents a novel Mixture-of-Expert (MoE) scheme to resolve global shift in parameters. An adapted differential privacy method is applied to design and protect the privacy of local updates during the training. Experimental evaluation on a large-scale multi-institutional COVID-19 dataset demonstrated the efficiency of the proposed framework over competing learning approaches with statistical significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it