Generalizable Segmentation of COVID-19 Infection From Multi-Site Tomography Scans: A Federated Learning Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COVID-19-like pandemics are a major threat to the global health system that causes a lot of deaths across ages. Large-scale medical images (i.e., X-rays, computed tomography (CT)) dataset is favored to the accuracy of deep learning (DL) in the screening of COVID-19-like pneumonia. The cost, time, and efforts for acquiring and annotating, for instance, large CT datasets make it impossible to obtain large numbers of samples from a single institution. The research attentions have been moved toward sharing medical images from numerous medical institutions. However, owing to the necessity to preserve the privacy of the data of a patient, it is challenging to build a centralized dataset from many institutions, especially during the pandemic. More. The difference in the data acquisition process from one institution to another brings another challenge known as distribution heterogeneity. This paper presents a novel federated learning framework, called Federated Multi-Site COVID-19 (FEDMSCOV), for efficient, generalizable, and privacy-preserved segmentation of COVID-19 infection from multi-site data. In FEDMSCOV, a novel is local drift smoothing (LDS) module encodes the input from feature space to frequency space, aiming to suppress the modules that are not conducive to generalization. Given the smoothed local updated, FEDMSCOV presents a novel Mixture-of-Expert (MoE) scheme to resolve global shift in parameters. An adapted differential privacy method is applied to design and protect the privacy of local updates during the training. Experimental evaluation on a large-scale multi-institutional COVID-19 dataset demonstrated the efficiency of the proposed framework over competing learning approaches with statistical significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".