MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322770797 · doi:10.3390/drones7030171

Dual-UAV Payload Transportation Using Optimized Velocity Profiles via Real-Time Dynamic Programming

2023· article· en· W4322770797 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrones · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersKhalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
KeywordsPayload (computing)Dynamic programmingTime horizonInterval (graph theory)Computer scienceTrajectoryFunction (biology)Energy consumptionControl theory (sociology)Trajectory optimizationMathematical optimizationSimulationReal-time computingOptimal controlEngineeringMathematicsAlgorithmControl (management)Electrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a real-time dynamic programming (RTDP) approach was developed for the first time to jointly carry a slung load using two unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with a trajectory optimized for time and energy consumption. The novel strategy applies RTDP algorithm, where the journey was discretized into horizons consisting of distance intervals, and for every distance interval, an optimal policy was obtained using a dynamic programming sweep. The RTDP-based strategy is applied for dual-UAV collaborative payload transportation using coordinated motion where UAVs act as actuators on the payload. The RTDP algorithm provides the optimal velocity decisions for the slung load transportation to either minimize the journey time or the energy consumption. The RTDP approach involves minimizing a cost function which is derived after simplifying the combined model of the dual-UAV-payload system. The cost function derivation was also accommodated to dynamically distribute the load/energy between two multi-rotor platforms during a transportation mission. The cost function is used to calculate transition costs for all stages and velocity decisions. A terminal cost is used at the last distance interval during the first phase of the journey when the velocity at the end of the current horizon is not known. In the second phase, the last stage or edge of the horizon includes the destination, hence final velocity is known which is used to calculate the transition cost of the final stage. Once all transition costs are calculated, the minimum cost is traced back from the final stage to the current stage to find the optimal velocity decision. The developed approach was validated in MATLAB simulation, software in the loop Gazebo simulation, and real experiments. The numerical and Gazebo simulations showed the successful optimization of journey time or energy consumption based on the selection of the factor λ. Both simulation and real experiments results show the effectiveness and the applicability of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it