MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323041974 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100110

Ensemble Machine Learning Based Identification of Adult Epilepsy

2023· article· en· W4323041974 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyIdentification (biology)Ensemble learningMachine learningArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePsychologyNeuroscienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epilepsy is a chronic non-communicable illness that affects brain individuals and impacts more than 50 million people globally.To predict epileptic seizures, we proposed machine learning-based ensemble learning technique in this study.In the preprocessed stage, we applied some important techniques such as Power line noise reduction and dividing the record into windows of 5 seconds.The project is created by the help of ensemble machine learning technique, which employs several machine learning algorithms, we used the following algorithms: decision tree, support vector machine, artificial neural networks, and convolutional neural networks.We used a dataset from PhysioNet website that contains adult EEG signals.Several convolutional layers were used to extract features from the EEG signals, after that, the feature set is utilized to train a classifier model, which combines the results.Our approach successfully reached 91% accuracy while 91% sensitivity and 91% specificity, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it