MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323055189 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3252499

An Accurate and Fast Animal Species Detection System for Embedded Devices

2023· article· en· W4323055189 on OpenAlexaff
Mai Ibraheam, Kin Fun Li, Fayez Gebali

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Encounters between humans and wildlife often lead to injuries, especially in remote wilderness regions, and highways. Therefore, animal detection is a vital safety and wildlife conservation component that can mitigate the negative impacts of these encounters. Deep learning techniques have achieved the best results compared to other object detection techniques; however, they require many computations and parameters. A lightweight animal species detection model based on YOLOv2 was proposed. It was designed as a proof of concept of and as a first step to build a real-time mitigation system with embedded devices. Multi-level features merging is employed by adding a new pass-through layer to improve the feature extraction ability and accuracy of YOLOv2. Moreover, the two repeated 3 × 3 convolutional layers in the seventh block of the YOLOv2 architecture are removed to reduce computational complexity, and thus increase detection speed without reducing accuracy. Animal species detection methods based on regular Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been widely applied; however, these methods are difficult to adapt to geometric variations of animals in images. Thus, a modified YOLOv2 with the addition of deformable convolutional layers (DCLs) was proposed to resolve this issue. Our experimental results show that the proposed model outperforms the original YOLOv2 by 5.0% in accuracy and 12.0% in speed. Furthermore, our analysis shows that the modified YOLOv2 model is more suitable for deployment than YOLOv3 and YOLOv4 on embedded devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207