MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323314127 · doi:10.3390/axioms12030271

Strong and Δ-Convergence Fixed-Point Theorems Using Noor Iterations

2023· article· en· W4323314127 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAxioms · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersMajmaah University
KeywordsBanach spaceGeneralizationMathematicsFixed pointUniformly convex spaceRegular polygonConvergence (economics)Fixed-point theoremIterative and incremental developmentPure mathematicsExtension (predicate logic)Applied mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceLp spaceEberlein–Šmulian theorem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wide range of new research articles in artificial intelligence, logic programming, and other applied sciences are based on fixed-point theorems. The aim of this article is to present an approximation method for finding the fixed point of generalized Suzuki nonexpansive mappings on hyperbolic spaces. Strong and Δ-convergence theorems are proved using the Noor iterative process for generalized Suzuki nonexpansive mappings (GSNM) on uniform convex hyperbolic spaces. Due to the richness of uniform convex hyperbolic spaces, the results of this paper can be used as an extension and generalization of many famous results in Banach spaces together with CAT(0) spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it