MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323338401 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2023.3251297

A Continuous Actor–Critic Deep Q-Learning-Enabled Deployment of UAV Base Stations: Toward 6G Small Cells in the Skies of Smart Cities

2023· article· en· W4323338401 on OpenAlexafffund
Nahid Parvaresh, Burak Kantarcı

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBase stationComputer scienceSoftware deploymentDeep learningLeverage (statistics)Reinforcement learningDroneCellular networkReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uncrewed aerial vehicle-mounted base stations (UAV-BSs), also know as drone base stations, are considered to have promising potential to tackle the limitations of ground base stations. They can provide cost-effective Internet connection to es that are out of infrastructure. They can also take over quickly as service providers when ground base stations fail in an unanticipated manner. UAV-BSs benefit from their mobile nature that enables them to change their 3D locations if the demand profile changes rapidly. In order to effectively leverage the mobility of UAV-BSs so as to maximize the performance of the network, 3D location of UAV-BSs requires continuous optimization. However, solving the optimization problem of UAVBSs is NP-hard with no deterministic solution in polynomial time. In this paper, we propose a continuous actor-critic deep reinforcement learning solution in order to solve the location optimization problem of UAV-BSs in the presence of mobile endpoints. The simulation results show that the proposed model significantly improves the network performance compared to Qlearning, deep Q-learning and conventional algorithms. While the Q-learning and deep Q-learning-based baselines reach the sum data rate of 35 Mbps and 42 Mbps respectively, our proposed ACDQL-based strategy maximizes the sum data rate of endpoints to 45 Mbps. Furthermore, the proposed ACDQLbased methodology reduces the convergence time of the UAV-BS placement optimization by 85 percent compared to the Q-learning and deep Q-learning baselines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207