MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323338401 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2023.3251297

A Continuous Actor–Critic Deep Q-Learning-Enabled Deployment of UAV Base Stations: Toward 6G Small Cells in the Skies of Smart Cities

2023· article· en· W4323338401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBase stationComputer scienceSoftware deploymentDeep learningLeverage (statistics)Reinforcement learningDroneCellular networkReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uncrewed aerial vehicle-mounted base stations (UAV-BSs), also know as drone base stations, are considered to have promising potential to tackle the limitations of ground base stations. They can provide cost-effective Internet connection to es that are out of infrastructure. They can also take over quickly as service providers when ground base stations fail in an unanticipated manner. UAV-BSs benefit from their mobile nature that enables them to change their 3D locations if the demand profile changes rapidly. In order to effectively leverage the mobility of UAV-BSs so as to maximize the performance of the network, 3D location of UAV-BSs requires continuous optimization. However, solving the optimization problem of UAVBSs is NP-hard with no deterministic solution in polynomial time. In this paper, we propose a continuous actor-critic deep reinforcement learning solution in order to solve the location optimization problem of UAV-BSs in the presence of mobile endpoints. The simulation results show that the proposed model significantly improves the network performance compared to Qlearning, deep Q-learning and conventional algorithms. While the Q-learning and deep Q-learning-based baselines reach the sum data rate of 35 Mbps and 42 Mbps respectively, our proposed ACDQL-based strategy maximizes the sum data rate of endpoints to 45 Mbps. Furthermore, the proposed ACDQLbased methodology reduces the convergence time of the UAV-BS placement optimization by 85 percent compared to the Q-learning and deep Q-learning baselines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it