A dynamic probabilistic risk assessment platform for nuclear power plants under single and concurrent transients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment (DPRA) of nuclear power plants (NPPs) has become one of the most critical research areas, especially in the aftermath of the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. Uncertainty in NPP behavior is key when considering its safety under different operating conditions. Such uncertainty typically results from operation parameters, system conditions, and modeling assumptions. This study integrates the system dynamics (SD) modelling approach with an uncertainty analysis method to quantify the dynamic probabilistic risk in NPPs. To demonstrate the approach’s applicability, the average fuel temperature is used to estimate the probability of reactor core damage under different transients, representing perturbations in reactivity and steam valve coefficient. A Monte Carlo simulation is employed to investigate the effect of uncertainties associated with the different model parameters. A global sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the total delayed neutron fraction, the heat transfer coefficient from fuel to coolant, the coolant temperature coefficient of reactivity, and the fuel temperature coefficient of reactivity are the primary controllers of the plant response variability under the transients considered. In summary, the integration of SD modelling and uncertainty analysis presents an effective DPRA approach that overcomes the limitations of static counterparts while minimizing the computational resources required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".