MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323825473 · doi:10.1137/21m1459265

GPMR: An Iterative Method for Unsymmetric Partitioned Linear Systems

2023· article· en· W4323825473 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeneralized minimal residual methodMathematicsLinear systemBlock (permutation group theory)ResidualIterative methodApplied mathematicsMatrix (chemical analysis)Iterative and incremental developmentAlgorithmComputer scienceCombinatoricsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce an iterative method named Gpmr (general partitioned minimum residual) for solving block unsymmetric linear systems. Gpmr is based on a new process that simultaneously reduces two rectangular matrices to upper Hessenberg form and is closely related to the block-Arnoldi process. Gpmr is tantamount to Block-Gmres with two right-hand sides in which the two approximate solutions are summed at each iteration, but its storage and work per iteration are similar to those of Gmres. We compare the performance of Gpmr with Gmres on linear systems from the SuiteSparse Matrix Collection. In our experiments, Gpmr terminates significantly earlier than Gmres on a residual-based stopping condition with an improvement ranging from around 10% up to 50% in terms of number of iterations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it