MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323979651 · doi:10.1353/ari.2023.0017

Debt, Law, Realism: Nigerian Writers Imagine the State at Independence by Neil ten Kortenaar

2023· article· en· W4323979651 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAriel · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsRealismSociologyIndependence (probability theory)State (computer science)LawColonialismEmancipationAestheticsLiteraturePolitical sciencePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Debt, Law, Realism: Nigerian Writers Imagine the State at Independence by Neil ten Kortenaar Uchechukwu Peter Umezurike (bio) Neil ten Kortenaar. Debt, Law, Realism: Nigerian Writers Imagine the State at Independence. McGill-Queen's UP, 2021. Pp. 282. CAD $34.95. In several of his essays and public engagements, the Nigerian writer Chinua Achebe underscores the power of literature to re-educate people and revamp the maligned identities of marginalised social groups or colonised nations. In his book Hopes and Impediments (1988), the chapter on "The Novelist as Teacher" articulates his stance on the pedagogic role writers can play in society, stating that literature should be applied to the re-education of Africans. Neil ten Kortenaar's Debt, Law, Realism: Nigerian Writers Imagine the State at Independence illustrates this point in engaging prose, delineating how African writers attempt to project their vision of the state and society shortly after their countries emerged out of colonial rule. The literary scholar and academic extols Achebe as a pedagogue, framing his novels as invested in political education and citizenship formation in pre-independence Nigeria. Kortenaar stages his arguments through ten chapters, demonstrating a firm grasp of African literary traditions. The introduction presents methodological and theoretical contexts and prefaces how Achebe and his fellow African writers conceive of and contend with the emergence of the modern state, a colonial inheritance. Kortenaar's methodology is framed by the question of faith, or more precisely, trust, which he contends is political—and economical, I should add. The principle of trust organizes his careful reading of novels by African authors. Kortenaar explains trust in terms of credit, debt, and reciprocity, showing how it is central to the imagined relationship between the writer and the reader and between the citizen and the modern state. Achebe and his cohorts recognize the need to gain their readers' trust in literature and its potential to imagine a new nation, one founded more on interpersonal reciprocity and less on total submission (a characteristic of the colonial regime). As Kortennar argues, the first generation of Nigerian novelists embraced realist fiction because it illuminated "the connection between that genre and political formation, between readers and citizens, and they were concerned with creating citizens" (8). Kortenaar's choice of novels set in precolonial, colonial, and postcolonial periods shows how African writers have been thinking about questions of trust, power, succession, legitimacy, and sovereignty. Moreover, he demonstrates that the idea of the state was never absent from the cultural imaginary of African writers, regardless of the period in which they lived. [End Page 157] The first three chapters of the book focus on the characters of Unoka and Okonkwo, father and son, in Achebe's Things Fall Apart (1958). In Chapter One, "Crediting African Literature," Kortenaar argues that Achebe created Okonkwo to show that trust and creditworthiness underpin moral character. Chapter Two, "Reciprocity," states that the precolonial Igbo democracy was built on a relational structure of gifts and debts, underlining how reciprocity can function to ensure social justice. And Chapter Three, "Sovereign Debt," considers the subject of sacrifice, especially if an individual is indebted to a sovereign authority symbolized by the gods or the state. The preceding chapters, thus, reveal how the establishment of the modern state in Africa changed the notion of debt and social relations. In a stateless or village society, such as the precolonial Igbo nation, debt was based on reciprocity, and individuals were expected to repay their debt as a matter of faith. Therefore, an interpersonal debt system shaped the relationship between the creditor and the debtor. However, the modern state supplanted this system with its rule of law and instituted itself as an "impersonal creditor" to whom every citizen was indebted infinitely. This form of debt was unrepayable so long as the individual was living within the state's territory. While Chapter Four, "Of Confidence and Markets," explores how tricksters undermine trust and the social order, tracing the contrast between Achebe's Things Fall Apart and Amos Tutuola's The Palm-Wine Drinkard (1952) in their narratives of market exchange, Chapter Five, "Women and the Cowrie Zone," identifies Flora Nwapa's Efuru (1966) as an example of the market...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it