MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324137857 · doi:10.1136/oem-2023-epicoh.246

P-340 Closing gaps for preventing cervical cancer among Urban: slum, non-slum, rural and tribal Indian homemakers and manual labourers – experiences of community research

2023· article· en· W4324137857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCervical cancerMedicineSlumFunctional illiteracySocioeconomic statusHealth carePovertyReproductive healthGerontologyDemographyEnvironmental healthFamily medicineCancerPopulationSociologyEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Deaths due to cervical cancer remains high among women from rural and low-income settings in India. Majority of women among these settings are expected to be homemakers by occupation. Being homemakers and from low economic background, these women in society are most neglected and deprived of fundamental rights for sexual health increasing their susceptibility for genital infection and cervical cancer. Illiteracy, timidness, dependence on male partner for health-related decisions, stigma and misconception adds to the vulnerability of these women for cervical cancer. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> Our community based cross-sectional studies enrolled 120 tribal women and 1600 women across low-income neighborhood settings [i.e. Urban slum (500), Urban non-slum (500), rural (600)] in age group of 30–69 yrs. Different modalities of communication were used to create awareness about sexual health including cervical cancer among these groups. Understanding reluctance and barriers of these women for accessing health care facilities, these studies explored the possibilities of HPV self-sampling as a screening modality for cervical cancer. <h3>Results and Conclusion</h3> Among 120 women in tribal settings, 55% and 38.3% were homemakers and manual laborers respectively. 95% women had not received/heard of sexual health education and did not perceive any risk of acquiring cervical cancer demonstrating low health literacy. Among 1600 women enrolled from the low-income neighborhood settings, overall, 75.9% and 12.3% women were homemakers and manual laborers respectively. 74.8% women perceived risk of getting cervical cancer but demonstrated poor care trajectory. After creating awareness towards cervical cancer, 95.8% tribal, 89.8% urban slum, 92.8% urban non-slum and 98.1% rural women accepted HPV-Self-sampling respectively. Culturally appropriate art-based health education materials to generate awareness towards cervical cancer and HPV self-sampling as screening modality looks promising to prevent cervical cancer among these vulnerable and underprivileged homemakers from low economic settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it