MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324326519 · doi:10.1080/10407782.2023.2176381

Particle-resolved simulations for nanofluid thermal enhancement in channel flows

2023· article· en· W4324326519 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNumerical Heat Transfer Part A Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNanofluidThermal conductivityHeat transferMaterials scienceHeat fluxVolume fractionHeat transfer coefficientThermodynamicsHeat transfer enhancementParticle (ecology)MechanicsLattice Boltzmann methodsThermal conductionComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanofluids have been studied extensively for improved heat transfer performances in various thermal systems. In this article, we adopt the particle-resolved method to study the thermal enhancement of nanofluids in channel flows under constant wall temperature (CWT) and constant heat flux (CHF) conditions. The smoothed profile method is employed to describe the nanoparticles suspending in the base fluid and the lattice Boltzmann method is utilized to solve the flow and temperature fields. Unlike the continuum representation of nanofluids, this particle-resolved approach can incorporate the thermophysical properties of the base fluid and nanoparticles directly in simulation, and flow and temperature distributions around nanoparticles are available. Our simulations reveal detailed information on the nanoparticle influence on the wall thermal distributions, and illustrate the enhancement mechanism for heat transfer between the boundary wall and fluid flow: The nanoparticles near the wall increase the local heat flux under CWT and decreases the local wall temperature under CHF condition. The heat transfer coefficient is utilized to characterize the thermal performance for nanofluids, and it increases 6–16% for the nanofluid systems considered in our simulations. The effects of key system parameters, such as the nanoparticle volume fraction, thermal conductivity, and Reynolds number, are also investigated. Our results show that, for both CWT and CHF systems, the particle volume fraction and thermal conductivity can both increase the heat transfer coefficient; however, the particle conductivity effect becomes less significant or even negligible when it is greatly larger than the base fluid conductivity. For the limited range and relatively low values of Reynolds numbers considered in this work, it appears that the Reynolds number has no obvious influence on the system thermal performance. These finding could be beneficial for a better understanding of the complexity of nanofluid systems and for future nanofluid development and applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it