MetNet: A Novel Low-Complexity Neural Network-Aided Detection for Faster-Than-Nyquist (FTN) Signaling in ISI Channels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the application of neural networks to Viterbi detection of FTN signals in an intersymbol interference (ISI) channel. The main contribution of this paper is to propose a receiver structure for detecting FTN signals in unknown static ISI channel. In particular, we propose a novel low-complexity neural network structure for calculating the branch metrics, and we explore its suitability for FTN signalling with channel uncertainty. We compare the proposed network, which we call the Metric Net (MetNet), to a benchmark neural network-based technique for metric calculation, the ViterbiNet, which was originally designed for ISI channels. The simulation results confirm that the MetNet outperforms the ViterbiNet, with two orders of magnitude lower complexity, and is much more resilient to channel uncertainty than the traditional Viterbi detector, which uses Euclidean distance for metric calculations. We further show that the MetNet exhibits robustness to being trained at mismatched SNR values and FTN pulse acceleration factors, meaning that the number of trained models required can be significantly reduced. Additionally, the results show that the proposed MetNet remains a favorable alternative at much higher levels of channel uncertainties. The results also reflect that we can generalize the MetNet to work with different channel models defined by different decaying factors. Finally, we show that we succeed in achieving a bandwidth efficiency gain of 33% due to FTN by using the MetNet in the presence of channel uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it