MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Artificial Intelligence Based Rural E-Commerce Boosting Using Big Data

2022· article· en· W4360585453 on OpenAlexaff
Saumi Roy, Archana Ravindra Salve, Jaymin Shah, Sanjeev Kadam, Iskandar Muda, Manoranjan Dash

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSmart Systems and Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataRural areaContext (archaeology)Modernization theoryBusinessAgricultureE-commerceDistribution (mathematics)Economic growthComputer scienceEconomicsGeographyPolitical scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following 40 years of reform and opening up, India's economy has achieved a new peak, with rural ecommerce emerging as a key driver of this expansion. As the state's policy continues to develop to encourage rural ecommerce, the sector has opened up a big historical opportunity, with the size of the market growing and the sector's social awareness rising rapidly. With the widespread use of big data networks, big data-driven, AI-powered e-commerce has also grown rapidly in recent years. The use of electronic commerce is more common in urban regions than in rural ones. As part of the plan for "revitalizing the countryside," widespread use of ecommerce in rural regions will be a major step toward bolstering the rural economy. The growth of this route has the potential to strongly encourage the modernization of antiquated production techniques in rural regions while also improving the accessibility and efficiency of the flow of agricultural goods inside India and so facilitating their eventual export. The third-party distribution model was used as the logistics approach, and agricultural items from Mysore City, such as paddy and vegetables, served as the primary research objects to illustrate the utility of the Novel Colony Algorithm in the context of rural e-commerce. The issue of the third-party distribution model is examined through the process of model building. In light of this, PyCharm is used to determine the shortest path and total cost using a novel colony algorithm. In this research, we evaluate the models and conduct analyses of the efficiency and cost issues that arise when changing the parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Systems and Machine LearningFrench-language works237,207