MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360877805 · doi:10.1002/pamm.202200314

FE‐based modeling of a mesoscale piezoelectric motor

2023· article· en· W4360877805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePAMM · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstEuropean Commission
KeywordsUnimorphFinite element methodStatorRotor (electric)TorqueRotation (mathematics)Mechanical engineeringComputer scienceAcousticsControl theory (sociology)EngineeringPiezoelectricityStructural engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The manufacturing of systems at the mesoscale on the order of millimeters to centimeters is costly and challenging. To simplify the development process, the finite element method (FEM) can be used to compare and evaluate different design variations at an early stage. This method also allows for gaining a more precise understanding of the system's behavior. In robotic applications it is the torque that is of the greatest interest as a sufficiently high torque mitigates the need for a gearbox, which is very difficult to manufacture and integrate at small scales. Given this background, the present work aims to develop a finite element model for the numerical representation of a class of rotational piezoelectric motors based on multiple unimorph arms. The influence of different design parameters on the resulting torque is analyzed utilizing this model. The motor design consists of a planar rotor and a flat spring, a stator with three unimorph arms, as well as a shaft. With a total integrated motor thickness of 0.8 mm, the weight is approximately 200 milligrams. The rotation is mainly caused by the tip contact between the arms of the stator and the rotor itself. Experiments with prototypes have shown that bidirectional rotation is possible with the design, which is then investigated in more detail using the numerical model. There are several challenges here in the non‐linearity due to the contact between the individual components and the high‐frequency excitation of the motor in the kHz range. The modeling also requires validation experiments to determine the resulting properties for the coupled system of structural and piezoelectric components. This includes both the measurement of the unimorph arms and the measurement of the natural frequencies of the stator with the piezoelectric unimorphs by a laser scanning vibrometer and displacement sensors. The scanning vibrometer also provides the opportunity to compare the vibration modes, as an important non‐local output quantity, in order to achieve good agreement between the numerical and experimental results. In the next stage, the model is to serve as the basis for multi‐objective optimization to achieve maximum torque in the smallest possible volume. Further miniaturization possibilities will also be investigated in future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it