Organizational enablers and outcomes of IT affordance actualisation: a socio-technical perspective on knowledge sharing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the IT affordance lens, this study presents a holistic socio-technical view of the organisational factors that affect the knowledge-sharing (KS) behaviour of employees. It develops and empirically validates a conceptual model that theorises the relationships between KS affordances, organisational culture, management support, and peer KS in order to specify how these relationships shape the KS behaviour of employees. Data for this study was collected using a survey of a large pool of public service employees working at various government agencies (n = 4,090 respondents). The results of this study provide evidence that KS affordances offered by both traditional KS information systems and by enterprise social media increase employees’ overall willingness to share their knowledge. However, these results also show that KS affordances are more likely to be perceived when organisational culture favours KS, and that management support moderates the relationship between KS affordances and employees’ KS behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it