Outdoor Localization for a Mobile Robot under Different Weather Conditions Using a Deep Learning Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A fundamental issue in robotics is the precise localization of mobile robots in uncertain environments.Due to changing environmental patterns and lighting, localization under difficult perceptual conditions remains problematic.This paper presents an approach for locating an outdoor mobile robot using deep learning algorithms merge with 3D Light Detection and Ranging LiDAR data and RGB-D image.This approach is divided into three levels.The first is the training level, which involves scanning the localization area with a 3D LiDAR sensor and then converting the data into a 2.5D image based on the Principal Component Analysis.The testing is the second level in the Intensity Hue Saturation process.Then, the RGB and Depth images are combined to create a 2.5D fusion image.These datasets are trained and tested using Convolution Neural Networks.The K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm is used in the third level is the classification.The results show that the proposed approach is better in terms of accuracy of 97.46% and the Mean error distance is 0.6 meters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".