MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361770306 · doi:10.1109/tac.2023.3262444

Stability Analysis of Delayed Discrete Singular Piecewise Homogeneous Markovian Jump Systems With Unknown Transition Probabilities via Sliding-Mode Approach

2023· article· en· W4361770306 on OpenAlexaff
Yonggui Kao, Yueqiao Han, Yanzheng Zhu, Zhan Shu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPiecewiseControl theory (sociology)JumpMarkov processMathematicsHomogeneousMode (computer interface)Stability (learning theory)Transition (genetics)Mathematical analysisApplied mathematicsStatistical physicsComputer sciencePhysicsControl (management)CombinatoricsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the sliding-mode control (SMC) strategy is outlined for discrete-time singular Markovian jump systems with time-varying delays and time-varying transition probabilities (TPs). To simplify the complexities arising from the time-varying TPs in the Markov chain, the TPs in this study are reasonably considered to be finite piecewise-homogeneous. The variations of TPs are stochastic and governed by a higher level transition probability (HTP) matrix. It is acceptable for both the TP matrix and HTP matrix to be partly unknown, which makes the system closer to reality and more complex to investigate. In this context, our goal lies in constructing a common sliding-mode surface to avoid the effects of switching among sequential subsystems and piecewise homogeneous TPs on the convergence of the sliding-mode surface. Additionally, we aim to design an appropriate SMC law to guarantee the reachability of the quasi-sliding mode in a finite-time interval. Through the linear matrix inequalities, sufficient criteria are offered to make the closed-loop dynamic system stochastically admissible. Finally, the numerical result will show that the presented SMC strategy is valid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207