MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362510447 · doi:10.1353/nai.2023.0028

Collective Care: Indigenous Motherhood, Family, and HIV/AIDS by Pamela J. Downe

2023· article· en· W4362510447 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousGender studiesSociologyEthnographyContext (archaeology)Participant observationNarrativeAnthropologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Collective Care: Indigenous Motherhood, Family, and HIV/AIDS by Pamela J. Downe Caroline Fidan Tyler Doenmez (bio) Collective Care: Indigenous Motherhood, Family, and HIV/AIDS by Pamela J. Downe University of Toronto Press, 2021 despite the robust body of research addressing various dimensions of HIV/AIDS, very little has been written about the families impacted by this epidemic. Pamela Downe’s Collective Care endeavors to fill this gap and counter the presumption that motherhood and HIV/AIDS are “irreconcilable categories” (34). The ethnography is animated by the question: “What does it mean to be a mother in the context of HIV/AIDS?” (3) Downe responds to this inquiry in five substantive chapters that draw on narrative-style interviews and participant observation research, emerging out of a collaborative project that she undertook with People Who Access Services (PWAS) at an organization called AIDS Saskatoon. A unique methodological dimension of the text is a “photovoice” project, in which participants took pictures to reflect “what it means to be a parent in the context of HIV/AIDS in Saskatchewan” (15). In the opening section, Downe thoughtfully accounts for her positionality as a non-Indigenous anthropologist, addressing her commitments to Indigenous rights and decolonizing research. Throughout the book, she foregrounds the voices and stories of her Indigenous participants to develop her central claim that collective care is a vital form of mothering for women living with HIV/AIDS and a “cultural touchstone” that sustains community bonds and ensures the well-being of children (viii). The author shows how this form of kinship challenges widely accepted Euro-North American concepts of family roles, exceeding biological definitions of parenthood and involving a wide array of figures who assume caregiving responsibilities for one another. She highlights how collective care is often misperceived as negligent, irresponsible, and unmotherly by the public and various institutional figures, including teachers, police, and social workers. Against this stigma, collective care endures as an invaluable source of support and belonging for families living with HIV/AIDS. Saskatchewan has the highest rates of HIV/AIDS of any province in Canada and Indigenous people—specifically women of child-bearing age—are vastly overrepresented in these numbers. Downe is emphatic that the epidemic is a product of state-sanctioned and structural violence, asserting: “In Saskatchewan, the forced disruption and dislocation of Indigenous societies underpins the HIV virus, disease and death” (14). She engages syndemic theory to argue [End Page 133] that HIV/AIDS is not a stand-alone issue but rather intimately interrelated with other health conditions, including the hepatitis C virus, injection drug use, and opioid addiction, all of which are driven by the legacies and ongoing impacts of settler colonial dispossession and intergenerational trauma. One of these persistent forms of colonial violence that Downe examines is the devastating trend of Indigenous child removal by social workers. Her chapters chronicle how parents and caregivers live with the pervasive threat of losing their children and how they are constantly subjected to the expectation of parental failure by virtue of their addictions or diagnoses. Through the stories of her participants, she provides critical documentation of these women’s experiences of having their children removed, illustrating the punitive, exhausting, and deleterious effects of this system of child welfare. As one participant stated: “All of us Aboriginal moms, all of us HIV moms, we live with this nightmare all the time” (25). Her interlocutors’ narratives reveal how their perceived shortcomings as parents often result from their involvement in collective care-giving networks that are misinterpreted as “neglectful” by authorities. Moreover, Downe argues that there is “a colonizing nature to the politics of individualistic motherhood” (54) in that those who are regarded as deviating from this norm are subjected to increased scrutiny and judgment. She deftly demonstrates that this damaging stigma does not correspond to the reality of her participants’ dedication to raising, protecting, and nurturing their children. Collective Care unsettles dominant assumptions about motherhood, family, and care, detailing how these culturally specific understandings are socially and historically situated. This provocation prompts readers to interrogate deeply ingrained notions of what constitutes worthy parenthood and a desirable family unit. The book invites further scholarly attention to the ways in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it