MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362511111 · doi:10.1353/ecs.2023.0042

Journey to Italy by Marquis de Sade

2023· article· en· W4362511111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clorinda Donato

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRousseau and Enlightenment Thought
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)Art historyHistoryClassicsArtSociologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Journey to Italy by Marquis de Sade Clorinda Donato Marquis de Sade, Journey to Italy, translated by James A. Steintrager (Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 2020). Pp. 832. 8 color and 22 b/w illus. $131.00 cloth. James Steintrager's monumental translation of the Marquis de Sade's Journey to Italy is required reading for any student of Sade who wishes to discover what the most notorious libertine of the eighteenth century might have been like in the comparatively mundane role of grand tourist. Steintrager's meticulously translated, annotated, and edited edition envelops the reader in Sade's universe, as we hear the [End Page 496] marquis describe, in the first-person, cities, towns, monuments, churches, lifestyles, and habits in an encyclopedic work that is second only to Giacomo Casanova's Histoire de ma vie in its author's single-minded obsession over leaving a work for posterity. Indeed, the travel account—combined with the author's painstaking postediting which included additions, directives to a future publisher about possible titles for the work, lists of days traveled, post stops, and expenses incurred—makes this journey unique among the many "voyages en Italie" produced by grand tourists in the eighteenth century. Sade clearly strove to elevate the travel account genre to include historical and moral reflections on Italian customs and institutions in the interest of reforming them, to which his proposed addition to the travel account, "Project for a Reform in Italy," attests. Like those before him, he visited Italy full of expectations and preconceptions that would be systematically met or dashed over the course of two separate trips spanning several months and traversing the diverse languages, cultures, and practices that made up the cultural-political mosaic that was Italy. Thus Sade, the Frenchman, followed in the distinguished footsteps of the members of his sixteenth-century compatriots Joachim Du Bellay and Pierre Ronsard. All sought to steep themselves in the glory of an ancient Rome conflated, to be sure, with the superimposed Renaissance rediscovery of arts and letters. However, Sade's first-hand experience of "sic transit gloria mundi" in 1775, some 250 years after the Pléiade authors first struck out for Italy, landed him before new evidence of that glory in the recently excavated sites of Pompei and Herculaneum, unknown in the Renaissance. Imbued with erudition gleaned from the study of classical texts, albeit in translation, (as Steintrager points out, Sade was an amateur, not a classical scholar), Sade pieces together a personal narrative and history of Italy as a debauched archive for his future libertine writing. The repository function of Sade's Italian travel narrative is particularly evident when read in concert with his libertine novels, where the spatial parameters of his prose are confining, made up of locked-down menacing interiors. Just as Sade, libertine writer, imposes spatial control over the bodies and minds of his protagonists, so too does Sade, the travel writer, depict countless Italian places that he immediately casts as suspect; for despite the potentially spatial openness of unrestrained travel throughout Italy, Sade is inevitably drawn to enclosed settings where he speculates about the potential for abuse. He imagines scenarios that are reminiscent of his unfinished 120 Days of Sodom, or The School of Libertinage, when catacombs, monasteries, and walled-in villas become sites of no return for those whom he imagines trapped and sexually tortured inside. Sade is unflinching in his moralistic condemnation of the climate and history of Italy as a breeding ground and stage for the most profligate of behaviors. His assiduous readings of the most licentious of the classical authors, such as Catullus, Martial, and Ovid, certainly added ancient lascivious grist to the filter through which he viewed and commented upon the profusion of erotic statues and pictorial renderings that abounded at Pompei and Herculaneum. These sites had become, for Sade, synonymous with the foundations of depravity and, therefore, precursors and justifications for his own future writing and worldview. Indeed, everything he sees in Italy is processed to support his own beliefs in a flagrant, repeated performance of confirmation bias. This is particularly true when he discusses Italian women, whom, he explains, have rebuffed his advances through...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century StudiesSame topicRousseau and Enlightenment ThoughtFrench-language works237,207