MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362653742 · doi:10.1109/mce.2023.3264884

AI-Based Electricity Grid Management for Sustainability, Reliability, and Security

2023· article· en· W4362653742 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsSustainabilitySmart gridElectricity marketGridAnomaly detectionReliability (semiconductor)Greenhouse gasSupply and demandEconomicsEngineeringMicroeconomicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greenhouse gas emissions are critical issues for mankind, especially from the viewpoint of electricity consumption. The smart grid is an emerging issue in terms of efficiency, sustainability, reliability, and security. This article proposes a concept for an AI-based electricity management system that includes prediction, anomaly detection, grid management, and market equalization modules. The prediction module predicts electricity supply and demand, and the anomaly detection module detects potential attacks and failures for security considerations. Based on prediction and detection, the grid management module determines sustainable subsidies and reliable operating reserve. Finally, the market equilibrium model balances electricity supply and demand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it