MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362701584 · doi:10.3390/ecws-7-14237

Short-Term Precipitation Forecasting Based on the Improved Extreme Learning Machine Technique

2023· article· en· W4362701584 on OpenAlexafffund
Isa Ebtehaj, Hossein Bonakdari, Bahram Gharabaghi, Mohamed Khelifi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of OttawaUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExtreme learning machineRegularization (linguistics)Term (time)PrecipitationComputer scienceQuantitative precipitation forecastOrthogonalityMean squared errorArtificial intelligenceMathematicsAlgorithmMachine learningMeteorologyStatisticsArtificial neural networkPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, an improved version of the Extreme Learning Machine, namely the Improved Weighted Regularization ELM (IWRELM), is proposed for hourly precipitation forecasting that is multi-steps ahead. After finding the optimal values of the proposed method, including the number of hidden neurons, the activation function, the weight function, the regularization parameter, and the effect of orthogonality, the IWRELM model was calibrated and validated. Thereafter, the calibrated IWRELM model was used to estimate precipitation up to ten hours ahead. The results indicated that the proposed IWRELM (R = 0.9996; NSE = 0.9993; RMSE = 0.015; MAE = 0.0005) has acceptable accuracy in short-term hourly precipitation forecasting up to ten hours ahead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207