Deep learning prediction of motor performance in stroke individuals using neuroimaging data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The degree of motor impairment and profile of recovery after stroke are difficult to predict for each individual. Measures obtained from clinical assessments, as well as neurophysiological and neuroimaging techniques have been used as potential biomarkers of motor recovery, with limited accuracy up to date. To address this, the present study aimed to develop a deep learning model based on structural brain images obtained from stroke participants and healthy volunteers. The following inputs were used in a multi-channel 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) model: fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and axial diffusivity maps obtained from Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) images, white and gray matter intensity values obtained from Magnetic Resonance Imaging, as well as demographic data (e.g., age, gender). Upper limb motor function was classified into "Poor" and "Good" categories. To assess the performance of the DL model, we compared it to more standard machine learning (ML) classifiers including k-nearest neighbor, support vector machines (SVM), Decision Trees, Random Forests, Ada Boosting, and Naïve Bayes, whereby the inputs of these classifiers were the features taken from the fully connected layer of the CNN model. The highest accuracy and area under the curve values were 0.92 and 0.92 for the 3D-CNN and 0.91 and 0.91 for the SVM, respectively. The multi-channel 3D-CNN with residual blocks and SVM supported by DL was more accurate than traditional ML methods to classify upper limb motor impairment in the stroke population. These results suggest that combining volumetric DTI maps and measures of white and gray matter integrity can improve the prediction of the degree of motor impairment after stroke. Identifying the potential of recovery early on after a stroke could promote the allocation of resources to optimize the functional independence of these individuals and their quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it