COVID-19 Detection via Fusion of Modulation Spectrum and Linear Prediction Speech Features
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has drastically impacted life around the globe. As life returns to pre-pandemic routines, COVID-19 testing has become a key component, assuring that travellers and citizens are free from the disease. Conventional tests can be expensive, time-consuming (results can take up to 48h), and require laboratory testing. Rapid antigen testing, in turn, can generate results within 15-30 minutes and can be done at home, but research shows they achieve very poor sensitivity rates. In this paper, we propose an alternative test based on speech signals recorded at home with a portable device. It has been well-documented that the virus affects many of the speech production systems (e.g., lungs, larynx, and articulators). As such, we propose the use of new modulation spectral features and linear prediction analysis to characterize these changes and design a two-stage COVID-19 prediction system by fusing the proposed features. Experiments with three COVID-19 speech datasets (CSS, DiCOVA2, and Cambridge subset) show that the two-stage feature fusion system outperforms the benchmark systems of CSS and Cambridge datasets while maintaining lower complexity compared to DL-based systems. Furthermore, the two-stage system demonstrates higher generalizability to unseen conditions in a cross-dataset testing evaluation scheme. The generalizability and interpretability of our proposed system demonstrate the potential for accessible, low-cost, at-home COVID-19 testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it