MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4363603985 · doi:10.1353/book.111514

Symbolic Objects in Contentious Politics

2023· book· en· W4363603985 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Michigan Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunism, Protests, Social Movements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of OxfordUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsPoliticsThe SymbolicContentious politicsComputer sciencePolitical scienceLawPsychologyPsychoanalysisSocial movement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tables 2.1 Strategic dilemmas of protest banners 8.1 Behavior of the G20 police (Toronto, Canada) This book has its origins in an international conference at the University of Aberdeen in the spring of 2019.The conference gave the book its title, and featured many of the contributors.The editors are chiefly thankful to the British Sociological Association for funding the event, and also to the University of Aberdeen for hosting it.We are also grateful to the Leverhulme Trust, the University of York, and the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London, for supporting our endeavors while the book took shape.We would like to express our gratitude to each of the contributors to this volume, who continued to develop their work despite the enormously challenging circumstances everyone faced through the COVID-19 pandemic.We would also like to extend special thanks to Chijioke Onuora of the University of Nigeria, for supplying excellent photographs of the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it