Ultra-Low-Complexity Algorithms With Structurally Optimal Multi-Group Multicast Beamforming in Large-Scale Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we propose ultra-low-complexity design solutions for multi-group multicast beamforming in large-scale systems. For the quality-of-service (QoS) problem, by utilizing the optimal multicast beamforming structure obtained recently in Dong& Wang:TSP2020, we convert the original problem into a non-convex weight optimization problem of a lower dimension and propose two fast first-order algorithms to solve it. Both algorithms are based on successive convex approximation (SCA) and provide fast iterative updates to solve each SCA subproblem. The first algorithm uses a saddle point reformulation in the dual domain and applies the extragradient method with an adaptive step-size procedure to find the saddle point with simple closed-form updates. The second algorithm adopts the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) method by converting each SCA subproblem into a favorable ADMM structure. The structure leads to simple closed-form ADMM updates, where the problem in each update block can be further decomposed into parallel subproblems of small sizes, for which closed-form solutions are obtained. We also propose efficient initialization methods to obtain favorable initial points that facilitate fast convergence. Furthermore, taking advantage of the proposed fast algorithms, for the max-min fair (MMF) problem, we propose a simple closed-form scaling scheme that directly uses the solution obtained from the QoS problem, avoiding the conventional computationally expensive method that iteratively solves the inverse QoS problem. We further develop lower and upper bounds on the performance of this scaling scheme. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithms offer near-optimal performance with substantially lower computational complexity than the state-of-the-art algorithms for large-scale systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".