MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4364302699 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2023.3265885

Ultra-Low-Complexity Algorithms With Structurally Optimal Multi-Group Multicast Beamforming in Large-Scale Systems

2023· article· en· W4364302699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer scienceInitializationMathematical optimizationMulticastComputational complexity theoryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we propose ultra-low-complexity design solutions for multi-group multicast beamforming in large-scale systems. For the quality-of-service (QoS) problem, by utilizing the optimal multicast beamforming structure obtained recently in Dong& Wang:TSP2020, we convert the original problem into a non-convex weight optimization problem of a lower dimension and propose two fast first-order algorithms to solve it. Both algorithms are based on successive convex approximation (SCA) and provide fast iterative updates to solve each SCA subproblem. The first algorithm uses a saddle point reformulation in the dual domain and applies the extragradient method with an adaptive step-size procedure to find the saddle point with simple closed-form updates. The second algorithm adopts the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) method by converting each SCA subproblem into a favorable ADMM structure. The structure leads to simple closed-form ADMM updates, where the problem in each update block can be further decomposed into parallel subproblems of small sizes, for which closed-form solutions are obtained. We also propose efficient initialization methods to obtain favorable initial points that facilitate fast convergence. Furthermore, taking advantage of the proposed fast algorithms, for the max-min fair (MMF) problem, we propose a simple closed-form scaling scheme that directly uses the solution obtained from the QoS problem, avoiding the conventional computationally expensive method that iteratively solves the inverse QoS problem. We further develop lower and upper bounds on the performance of this scaling scheme. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithms offer near-optimal performance with substantially lower computational complexity than the state-of-the-art algorithms for large-scale systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it