Tensor-Based Lyapunov Deep Neural Networks Offloading Control Strategy With Cloud–Fog–Edge Orchestration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using DNN (Deep Neural Networks) models to obtain high Quality of Services (QoS) through the cloud has become increasingly popular nowadays. Users want to use DNN by their edges (such as smartphones) anytime and anywhere. For most small and medium-sized enterprises, cloud computing resources are limited. Temporary exhaustion of resources may cause obvious service delay. For users, if all tasks are done locally, the battery capacity of the edge is too small to support such huge computing tasks. To remove this contradiction, we propose a Tensor-based Lyapunov DNN Offloading Control (TLDOC) strategy. First, we offload DNN computational tasks to cloud-fog-edge from an overall perspective. That is, layers in DNN are considered as basic offloadable objects. Second, we provide an original tensor-based Lyapunov equation and the entire process is derived in the tensor space. Lastly, we consider more key limiting factors (e.g., cellular data and remaining edge energy) to achieve better QoS. Via above contributions, our strategy reduces service delay and energy consumption for DNN cloud-fog-edge orchestration. Our experiments include two parts - detail and comparison. The experimental detail verifies that TLDOC strategy is practical and stable. Compared experiments show that our strategy could provide better QoS than existing methods on efficiency and energy saving.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it