MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365137755 · doi:10.1155/2023/7307224

Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of a Winding Rope Fluid Viscous Damper

2023· article· en· W4365137755 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Control and Health Monitoring · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDamperRopeParametric statisticsStructural engineeringDisplacement (psychology)EngineeringWire ropeControl theory (sociology)MechanicsComputer scienceMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigated a winding rope fluid viscous damper (WRFVD) that uses the frictional amplification mechanism of a winding rope to obtain the operating characteristics of a viscous damper-like device. The WRFVD combined the advantages of fluid viscous dampers and friction dampers. It not only retained the mechanical characteristics of the fluid viscous damper but also reduced manufacturing costs. First, the construction and working principles of the WRFVD were introduced. A theoretical model that could accurately simulate the hysteretic characteristics of the damper was derived. Then, a series of dynamic tests were performed on six prototypes of the WRFVD. The dynamic performance under different displacement amplitudes and device parameters was analyzed based on the test results. In addition, the theoretical model was validated by experimental results. Finally, a series of parametric analyses of the WRFVD were performed. The experimental results showed that the WRFVD is a type of velocity-dependent damper with smooth and plump hysteretic curves under sinusoidal displacement excitation. Fatigue loading tests showed that the WRFVD had excellent fatigue resistance capacity and stable operational performance. The established theoretical model was reasonable and satisfactorily reproduced the hysteretic properties of the WRFVD. The parametric analyses showed that it was not recommended to improve the performance of the WRFVD by the method of adjusting the damping coefficient and pretightening load. It was reasonable to adjust the performance of the WRFVD by setting a smaller velocity exponent, an appropriate winding turn of winding ropes, and a suitable friction coefficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it