Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Streets and highways are the background to people’s lives; they are built environments, entangled in long histories of settler colonial and racialized violence; they facilitate the flow of capital; and they can be the meeting points and materials of revolt. Just as these infrastructures are key nodes through which struggles over social organization occur, so too are they central to the formal, political, and aesthetic stakes of contemporary literature. This chapter surveys three critical frameworks (experiential, infrastructural, and logistical) that address the question of how and why streets and highways matter to literature and proposes we read these approaches as instances of what Henri Lefebvre has termed “levels” that must be apprehended together to complete the work of literary and social criticism. The chapter concludes with a reading of Vancouver poet Mercedes Eng’s Mercenary English and argues that Eng’s poetry not only illustrates what’s at stake in paying critical attention to the streets and highways that compose and appear in literary texts but also demands that such an engagement be carried out across these levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it