MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365151427 · doi:10.1080/17517575.2023.2200767

A human factor approach to distribution network design for e-commerce in supply chain system: a case study

2023· article· en· W4365151427 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnterprise Information Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainE-commerceSupply chain managementProduct (mathematics)BusinessDistribution (mathematics)Computer scienceProcess managementRisk analysis (engineering)MarketingWorld Wide WebMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distribution network for e-commerce is an important supply chain (SC) networks required for effective management of warehousing. Due to the recent disruption in the SC, minimal lead times for product delivery days can no longer be guaranteed, thereby causing an increase in distribution and delivery of goods. This paper investigated some human factors (HFs) to understand the root cause of the ongoing disruption in the SC system using statistical and exploratory data analysis. The findings revealed that HFs has a huge significance in a distribution system. To our best knowledge, these findings are seldom reported in literature of e-commerce systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it