MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365386048 · doi:10.46692/9781529218985.017

Living through a Pandemic in the Shadows of Gentrification and Displacement: Experiences of Marginalized Residents in Waterloo Region, Canada

2021· other· en· W4365386048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImpact of Education Environments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGentrificationPandemicDisplacement (psychology)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GeographySociologyMedicineEconomic growthPsychologyPsychoanalysisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction What happens to marginalized communities that were already facing gentrification and displacement pressures when a major pandemic arrives? This chapter engages with, listens to and amplifies the experiences of very low-income and unsheltered residents as they deal with the pre-existing conditions of extreme housing challenges and the arrival of the first wave of COVID-19. This chapter is part of a wider collaboration between the researchers at University of Waterloo (UW) and the Social Development Centre Waterloo Region (SDC), a charitable non-profit, social planning, and community development organization that focuses on advancing social justice and documenting the lived experiences of poverty and homelessness. Throughout the late spring and summer of 2020, we interviewed residents living through both gentrification and the pandemic. In this chapter, we focus on the everyday lives, challenges, experiences, and opportunities of some of the most marginalized members of our community. The pandemic brought new challenges into a landscape that was already hostile to low-income people. Our chapter seeks to amplify their voices and experiences, which is essential for achieving equitable policy outcomes. At the same time, we juxtapose their experiences with some of the dominant narratives of how COVID-19 has impacted the region. The gentrification context Our case study is the Region of Waterloo, which is comprised of three contiguous mid-sized cities (Kitchener, Waterloo, and Cambridge) and four rural townships. It ranks among Canada's fastest growing urban areas and has a total population of approximately 620,000. The region is situated 100km west of Toronto, Canada's largest city. Kitchener is the largest of the three cities; like many mid-sized communities, its downtown underwent several decades of decline, beginning in the 1980s. Large old homes were divided up into rooming houses, a cluster of social services organizations emerged, and downtown Kitchener became home to much of the region's very low-income population. However, over the past decade, a combination of publicand private-investment in the downtown core has led to a remarkable transformation and regeneration, unlike any other mid-sized city in Ontario. Much of this was spurred by the development of a new Light Rail Transit Line, which opened in 2019 and was financed by the Region of Waterloo. Even before a single passenger was carried, more than $3 billion worth of investment was made along the 19km route, much of it in downtown Kitchener.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImpact of Education EnvironmentsFrench-language works237,207