MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365519525 · doi:10.36859/jap.v6i1.1493

KEBIJAKAN PEMINDAHAN IBU KOTA NEGARA INDONESIA KE PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR DENGAN PENDEKATAN SWOT ANALYSIS (Studi pada Instansi Pemerintah Indonesia)

2023· article· id· W4365519525 on OpenAlexaff
Sumarna Sumarna, Lina Miftahul Jannah

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Academia Praja · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicStrategic Planning and Analysis
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSWOT analysisBusiness administrationHumanitiesEconomicsBusinessArtManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara Indonesia ke Provinsi Kalimantan Timur telah menjadi isu hangat dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, yang pada tanggal 15 Februari 2022 keputusan tersebut akhirnya disahkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 tentang Ibu Kota Negara. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis kebijakan pemindahan ibu kota negara, dengan studi pada instansi pemerintah Indonesia menggunakan analisis SWOT. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, dengan teknik pengambilan data menggunakan kuesioner kepada 60 orang responden melalui metode random sampling. Analisis SWOT dilakukan dengan matriks IFAS (Internal Factor Strategic) yang menjabarkan faktor kekuatan dan juga faktor kelemahan, serta matriks EFAS (External Factor Strategic) yang menjabarkan faktor peluang dan faktor ancaman. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa bobot skor dimensi kekuatan sebesar 1,69, bobot skor dimensi kelemahan sebesar 2,02, kemudian untuk bobot skor dimensi peluang 1,92, dan bobot skor dimensi ancaman sebesar 1,59. Nilai total skor rata-rata pada matriks IFAS adalah 3,71 dan nilai total skor rata-rata pada matriks EFAS adalah 3,51. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut terlihat bahwa faktor kelemahan dan juga faktor peluang masih lebih besar dibandingkan dengan faktor kekuatan dan fakor ancamannya.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Academia PrajaSame topicStrategic Planning and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207