MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365813971 · doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100641

Epidemiology and Outcomes of AKI Treated With Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy: The Multicenter CRRTnet Study

2023· article· en· W4365813971 on OpenAlexafffund
Oleksa Rewa, Victor Ortiz-Soriano, Joshua Lambert, Shaowli Kabir, Michael Heung, Andrew A. House, Divya Monga, Luis A. Juncos, Michelle Secic, Robin Piazza, Stuart L. Goldstein, Sean M. Bagshaw, Javier A. Neyra

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern UniversityUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
FundersAkebia TherapeuticsUniversity of AlbertaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesFresenius Medical Care North AmericaFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaAstute MedicalAlberta Health ServicesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesLondon Health Sciences CentreBioPortoVifor PharmaUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
KeywordsMedicineAcute kidney injuryRenal replacement therapyOliguriaAnuriaIntensive care unitKidney diseaseEpidemiologyComorbiditySepsisAPACHE IIIntensive careIntensive care medicineInternal medicineEmergency medicineRenal function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale & Objective Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is the predominant form of acute kidney replacement therapy used for critically ill adult patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Given the variability in CKRT practice, a contemporary understanding of its epidemiology is necessary to improve care delivery. Study Design Multicenter, prospective living registry. Setting & Population 1,106 critically ill adults with AKI requiring CKRT from December 2013 to January 2021 across 5 academic centers and 6 intensive care units. Patients with pre-existing kidney failure and those with coronavirus 2 infection were excluded. Exposure CKRT for more than 24 hours. Outcomes Hospital mortality, kidney recovery, and health care resource utilization. Analytical Approach Data were collected according to preselected timepoints at intensive care unit admission and CKRT initiation and analyzed descriptively. Results Patients' characteristics, contributors to AKI, and CKRT indications differed among centers. Mean (standard deviation) age was 59.3 (13.9) years, 39.7% of patients were women, and median [IQR] APACHE-II (acute physiologic assessment and chronic health evaluation) score was 30 [25-34]. Overall, 41.1% of patients survived to hospital discharge. Patients that died were older (mean age 61 vs. 56.8, P <0.001), had greater comorbidity (median Charlson score 3 [1-4] vs. 2 [1-3], P < 0.001), and higher acuity of illness (median APACHE-II score 30 [25-35] vs. 29 [24-33], P =0.003). The most common condition predisposing to AKI was sepsis (42.6%), and the most common CKRT indications were oliguria/anuria (56.2%) and fluid overload (53.9%). Standardized mortality ratios were similar among centers. Limitations The generalizability of these results to CKRT practices in nonacademic centers or low-and middle-income countries is limited. Conclusions In this registry, sepsis was the major contributor to AKI and fluid management was collectively the most common CKRT indication. Significant heterogeneity in patient- and CKRT-specific characteristics was found in current practice. These data highlight the need for establishing benchmarks of CKRT delivery, performance, and patient outcomes. Data from this registry could assist with the design of such studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney MedicineSame topicAcute Kidney Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207