MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366318344 · doi:10.1093/fmls/cqad001

<i>Concrete Poetry: A 21st-Century Anthology</i>. Ed. by Nancy Perloff

2023· article· en· W4366318344 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueForum for Modern Language Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryExhibitionSelection (genetic algorithm)Section (typography)Art historyAmerican poetryReading (process)LiteratureHistoryArtPhilosophyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book might be more accurately called a ‘primer’ or ‘reader’, rather than an anthology, as it should be an essential text on any introductory reading list relating to concrete poetry or the twentieth-century literary avant-garde more generally. Perloff’s introduction is a detailed and analytical account of the genre, tracing its international development from the 1950s to the present day. The selection of poems grew out of a 2017 exhibition curated by the editor – in her words, it singles out some of the leading practitioners of concrete poetry rather than aiming to be a comprehensive scholarly retrospective of the form. However, the selection has considerable range and depth. While readers familiar with the work of Eugen Gomringer, Augusto de Campos or Ian Hamilton Finlay might quibble the inclusion of certain poems over others from their œuvres, the cumulative effect is to provide a satisfying overview of work by poets who self-identify as concrete, as well as those who are influenced by its formal developments. Over 150 pages of the volume are given to the work of concrete poets themselves. In the first three sections the work of three seminal practitioners – de Campos, Finlay and Gerhard Rühm – is showcased through sizeable selections. Subsequent sections are arranged by country of origin: Brazil, Austria, Japan, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Germany and France, and the United States and Canada. A final section, ‘Postlude’, includes a small selection of visual poetry which builds upon the typographical manipulations of concrete, including American poet Susan Howe’s collages and the digital poetics of Brazilian André Vallias. In total there are 134 poems by 40 poets, plus further images of poems in the introduction. Throughout, the quality of the reproductions is stunning. Poems are printed in colour, an essential semantic as well as aesthetic component of much concrete poetry. Where the original print format of a poem deviates from the two-dimensional page, as with the folded paper structures of Finlay’s ‘standing poems’, these are presented with detailed photographs, often on a double page. Perloff includes an explanatory note for each poem. These notes offer glosses or translations of non-English texts, provide contextual information, outline influences behind the work, and suggest illuminating readings of poems which some readers might otherwise dismiss after a brief glance. The anthology also includes biographical notes on each poet. There are some enjoyable surprises in the selection, such as John Cage’s ‘Lecture on Nothing’, which shares with concrete poetry a commitment to manipulating typography and the page’s white space; Cage might best be described as a fellow traveller, rather than a card-carrying member, of the concrete movement. At times readers familiar with how concrete poetics moved off the page and into three-dimensional contexts may be left wanting more: there is no space, for example, for photographs of Finlay’s poetry garden Little Sparta, in which the physical situation of textual works in relation to each other and the wider garden space is an essential aspect of their meanings. But this is an excellent, visually pleasing selection which has the potential to bring concrete poetry to a new audience both within and outside the academy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it