Engineering strategies and active site identification of MXene-based catalysts for electrochemical conversion reactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MXenes have been extensively studied due to their high metallic conductivity, hydrophilic properties, tunable layer structure and attractive surface chemistry, making them highly desirable for energy-related applications. However, slow catalytic reaction kinetics and limited active sites have severely impeded their further practical applications. Surface engineering of MXenes has been rationally designed and investigated to regulate their electronic structure, increase the density of active sites, optimize the binding energy, and thus boost the electrocatalytic performance. In this review, we comprehensively summarized the surface engineering strategies for MXene nanostructures, including surface termination engineering, defect engineering, heteroatom doping engineering (metals or non-metals), secondary material engineering, and extension to MXene analogues. By identifying the roles of each component in the engineered MXenes at the atomic level, their intrinsic active sites have been discussed to establish the relationships between the atomic structures and catalytic activities. We highlighted the state-of-the-art progress of MXenes in electrochemical conversion reactions including hydrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen and sulfur conversion reactions. The challenges and perspectives of MXene-based catalysts for electrochemical conversion reactions are presented to inspire more efforts toward the understanding and development of MXene-based materials to meet the ever-growing demand for a sustainable future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it