MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366506635 · doi:10.11159/icgre23.151

Sustainable Development of the Engineering Geological Environment of Urban Areas: Transition from Theory to Practical Solutions

2023· article· en· W4366506635 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainable developmentComputer scienceCivil engineeringConstruction engineeringEnvironmental planningSystems engineeringGeologyEnvironmental scienceEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ensuring the safety of people's vital activities is one of the primary tasks of engineering environment research.The study and assessment of georisks is especially relevant for ur-ban areas, which are complex natural and technical systems with their own laws of existence and changes, which are caused by natural and man-made factors.The purpose of the article is to ana-lyse the modern theory and practice of making urban planning decisions, especially when placing responsible industrial, energy, and transport facilities; discussion of the need to consider the resource stability of natural systems, the peculiarities of the production of design and research works in conditions of increased georisks in connection with urbanisation and global climate changes.The main engineering and geological processes in urban areas, and their impact on the ecological situation under the conditions of global changes are considered.The main theoretical provisions for assessing the degree of impacts and associated georisks are outlined; a number of types of uncertainty in urban planning activity are characterised: natural, conceptual, strategic, methodical, temporal, and parametric.A critical analysis of the existing practice of making the most important decisions regarding the development of territories, placement, and construction of transport facilities was performed.Methods of developing a number of schemes of engineering-geological and ecological zoning of urbanised territories are proposed, in which categories are distinguished according to resistance to various types of impacts: floods, inundation, groundwater flooding, landslides, mudslides, snow avalanches, karst and suffocation processes, soil subsidence, etc., on the basis of which should be developed insurance risk assessment system.Examples of the assessment of the risk of engineering-geological conditions leaving the permissible regulatory state under some negative processes are given.Practical recommendations for solving the problem of sustainable development of urban areas are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it