Robots Autonomously Detecting People: A Multimodal Deep Contrastive Learning Method Robust to Intraclass Variations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robotic detection of people in crowded and/or cluttered human-centered environments including hospitals, stores and airports is challenging as people can become occluded by other people or objects, and deform due to clothing or pose variations. There can also be loss of discriminative visual features due to poor lighting. In this letter, we present a novel multimodal person detection architecture to address the mobile robot problem of person detection under intraclass variations. We present a two-stage training approach using: 1) a unique pretraining method we define as Temporal Invariant Multimodal Contrastive Learning (TimCLR), and 2) a Multimodal YOLOv4 (MYOLOv4) detector for finetuning. TimCLR learns person representations that are invariant under intraclass variations through unsupervised learning. Our approach is unique in that it generates image pairs from natural variations within multimodal image sequences and contrasts crossmodal features to transfer invariances between different modalities. These pretrained features are used by the MYOLOv4 detector for finetuning and person detection from RGB-D images. Extensive experiments validate the performance of our DL architecture in both human-centered crowded and cluttered environments. Results show that our method outperforms existing unimodal and multimodal person detection approaches in detection accuracy when considering body occlusions and pose deformations in different lighting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".