MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366832516 · doi:10.3847/psj/acc9a9

ASSIST: An Ephemeris-quality Test-particle Integrator

2023· article· en· W4366832516 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew J. Holman, Arya Akmal, Davide Farnocchia, Hanno Rein, Matthew J. Payne, R. Weryk, Daniel Tamayo, David M. Hernandez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Planetary Science Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsEphemerisIntegratorOrbit determinationComputer scienceOrbit (dynamics)Gravitational fieldCelestial mechanicsPlanetAerospace engineeringPhysicsAstronomyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We introduce ASSIST, a software package for ephemeris-quality integrations of test particles. ASSIST is an extension of the REBOUND framework and makes use of its IAS15 integrator to integrate test-particle trajectories in the field of the Sun, Moon, planets, and 16 massive asteroids, with the positions of the masses coming from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s DE441 ephemeris and its associated asteroid perturber file. The package incorporates the most significant gravitational harmonics and general-relativistic corrections. ASSIST also accounts for position- and velocity-dependent nongravitational effects. The first-order variational equations are included for all terms to support orbit fitting and covariance mapping. This new framework is meant to provide an open-source package written in a modern language to enable high-precision orbital analysis and science by the small-body community. ASSIST is open source, freely distributed under the GNU General Public license v3.0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Planetary Science JournalSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207